Rules for Schneib's Suggestions

I am conducting an overview of Internet sites to determine which are open to new members and which are abusive and which are political and which are scientific and which care about facts and which make up excuses.

I explain in each case my main reason for my characterization, which is factual and based on posts on that site at the time I write it, and I am willing to review evidence later and change an evaluation if the facts, not some lawyers, mandate it. The original evaluation will remain and the correction will as well. That's only fair. Don't cause problems and I won't hammer on you.