Diddly.
This is why the Libertardians are being allowed to denigrate Obama. If we do not oppose them the human race will lose.
Glad I'll be dead in a decade or two.
Enjoy global climate change. No whining; Itoljaso and Imdeadbyesufferfools.
Saturday, March 29, 2014
How Libertardians Attack
This story has been published in both Pharyngula and in DeSmogBlog.
The climate crank denier machine is running at full throttle against these two papers, which they themselves furnished the data for, and then attempted to deny.
I have been kicked offtwo three supposed "science" sites in the last several hours for posting these articles.
Maybe they want to burn me at the stake. "D
In each case, my posting of these two articles was followed within less than an hour by a ban from their sites. The suppression of science is obvious. These sites have nothing to do with science and are not interested in real science. They are attempting to sit on the Internet, occupying the names associated with free speech on science, and deny that free speech by manipulating their power.
The sites are:
scienceforums.net
thescienceforum.com
Cosmoquest/BAUT forums
The articles that have been banned and censored are:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/03/21/the-paper-they-dont-want-you-to-read
and
http://www.desmogblog.com/2014/03/20/science-journal-retracts-paper-showing-how-climate-change-sceptics-were-conspiracy-theorists-after-sceptics-shout
and the original scholarly articles that are being censored by the Swiss psychology journal are:
http://www.thebrokenwindow.net/papers/L/LskyetalPsychScienceinPressClimateConspiracy.pdf
and
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/files/2014/03/fpsyg-04-00073.pdf
Please write the Swiss journal and encourage them to publish the truth.
The climate crank denier machine is running at full throttle against these two papers, which they themselves furnished the data for, and then attempted to deny.
I have been kicked off
Maybe they want to burn me at the stake. "D
In each case, my posting of these two articles was followed within less than an hour by a ban from their sites. The suppression of science is obvious. These sites have nothing to do with science and are not interested in real science. They are attempting to sit on the Internet, occupying the names associated with free speech on science, and deny that free speech by manipulating their power.
The sites are:
scienceforums.net
thescienceforum.com
Cosmoquest/BAUT forums
The articles that have been banned and censored are:
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/2014/03/21/the-paper-they-dont-want-you-to-read
and
http://www.desmogblog.com/2014/03/20/science-journal-retracts-paper-showing-how-climate-change-sceptics-were-conspiracy-theorists-after-sceptics-shout
and the original scholarly articles that are being censored by the Swiss psychology journal are:
http://www.thebrokenwindow.net/papers/L/LskyetalPsychScienceinPressClimateConspiracy.pdf
and
http://freethoughtblogs.com/pharyngula/files/2014/03/fpsyg-04-00073.pdf
Please write the Swiss journal and encourage them to publish the truth.
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
Rules for Schneib's Suggestions
I am conducting an overview of Internet sites to determine which are open to new members and which are abusive and which are political and which are scientific and which care about facts and which make up excuses.
I explain in each case my main reason for my characterization, which is factual and based on posts on that site at the time I write it, and I am willing to review evidence later and change an evaluation if the facts, not some lawyers, mandate it. The original evaluation will remain and the correction will as well. That's only fair. Don't cause problems and I won't hammer on you.
I explain in each case my main reason for my characterization, which is factual and based on posts on that site at the time I write it, and I am willing to review evidence later and change an evaluation if the facts, not some lawyers, mandate it. The original evaluation will remain and the correction will as well. That's only fair. Don't cause problems and I won't hammer on you.
Monday, February 10, 2014
Michael Sam
This is awesome: the NFL, the bastion of heterosexualness, and homophobia, turns out to be figuring how to welcome this apparently pretty damn good defensive end/pass rusher into the league, despite the fact he's gay. In fact they're all talking about it not mattering any. The NFL Network is trying to ensure that his entry into the professional game is not any kind of scandal or problem. There are former players all over the media who are rooting for him, and a bunch of us fans as well. I think his popularity will help him.
Also I think all the sports networks are rooting for him, and quite a few of the athletes; far more than most people think. And I think there will be a lot more acceptance when there are great players who are gay. And the first ones will make their way like Jackie Robinson did. Now we talk about great players, and note that they're black. When we talk about great players, and note they're gay, we'll be much further along. It's a human interest thing like she's got two kids or he's a ping-pong fanatic.
The best thing about this is he's an Elephant; that's West Coast Defense terminology for a defensive end pass rusher. He's large, long-limbed, quick, strong, and aggressive. Just exactly what you want in a DE. He'll get a good shot and he's good enough to make the most of it. I'll be rooting for him unless he plays against my Niners. :D I actually hope we get him and fear who else might.
Whether he's gay or not is a side issue; the guy's an All-American, and co-defensive player of the year in the SEC. He has the physical and mental potential to be a first-round Hall of Famer. The reaction so far seems professional and welcoming. And the thing is, he's not trying to be a gay football player; he's trying to be a football player. Whether he's gay is irrelevant to him, and should be to everyone else too. He's not there for politics, he's there for football and that's how it should be. It's simple good sportsmanship.
The only disappointing thing is his father's reaction.
Also I think all the sports networks are rooting for him, and quite a few of the athletes; far more than most people think. And I think there will be a lot more acceptance when there are great players who are gay. And the first ones will make their way like Jackie Robinson did. Now we talk about great players, and note that they're black. When we talk about great players, and note they're gay, we'll be much further along. It's a human interest thing like she's got two kids or he's a ping-pong fanatic.
The best thing about this is he's an Elephant; that's West Coast Defense terminology for a defensive end pass rusher. He's large, long-limbed, quick, strong, and aggressive. Just exactly what you want in a DE. He'll get a good shot and he's good enough to make the most of it. I'll be rooting for him unless he plays against my Niners. :D I actually hope we get him and fear who else might.
Whether he's gay or not is a side issue; the guy's an All-American, and co-defensive player of the year in the SEC. He has the physical and mental potential to be a first-round Hall of Famer. The reaction so far seems professional and welcoming. And the thing is, he's not trying to be a gay football player; he's trying to be a football player. Whether he's gay is irrelevant to him, and should be to everyone else too. He's not there for politics, he's there for football and that's how it should be. It's simple good sportsmanship.
The only disappointing thing is his father's reaction.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)